In a somewhat unexpected turn of events, I am now seeing a dude. As in, a biological, male-assigned and male-identified individual. I won’t say it’s not weird in some ways. Then again, I don’t think I’d ever date anyone that expected traditional gender roles or attitudes, so it’s not all that different from dating anyone else who respects equality and difference.
That said, anyone who had met me in the past 2 years didn’t necessarily see me as anything besides a lesbian, because I was in a relationship with a woman. “Lesbian” is not a word that fits me, and I hate the implications that come with the word bisexual (read: katy perry, promiscuity, indecisiveness). I came to use “queer” as my identifier for the most part. I had a friend call herself “heteroflexible” – meaning her primary attraction was to members of the opposite sex, but she’ll make exceptions for some of the same sex – and I realized, “homoflexible” was a good word for me. Like heteroflexible, but the other way around. But my primary attraction has been towards women for quite some time, and that was something I knew wasn’t going to change.
And then BAM I fall for a dude.
I wasn’t that weirded out by it. I’ve known him for half of my life, and as a friend, he was always very accepting of my homoflexibility. He’s a sweetheart in every sense of the word, and when we first started seeing each other and I tried to have that whole serious conversation on how I’m still a homo, he said “I get that I’m your margin of error, and I’m totally okay with it”. How great is that? My primary attraction is still towards women – nothing has changed on that front – and I’m glad that at least I don’t have to explain it further to the person I’m seeing.
That said, a lot of people have had a problem with it – and have gone out of their way to tell me that they’re ‘disappointed’ that I’m now seeing a cis-male. And it’s interesting how the most abuse always comes from the same people that always talk about how sexuality and gender are spectrums, not fixed identities. It infuriates me when people within the queer community can’t turn that lens upon hetero relationships. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again – being in a heterosexual relationship doesn’t make me a heterosexual anymore than standing in a garage makes someone a car. I can see that it would be disappointing if I renounced my queerness, embraced heterosexual privilege, and acted like I’d never been anything but straight and narrow. But that’s not at all what I’m doing. I’m still vocal about my own grey areas, and still a staunch advocate for everyone loving whoever they damn well please as long as its consensual.
It’s frustrating having other people try to denounce my queer identity just because I am not dating someone who is visibly, openly “other”. My current partner doesn’t identify as heterosexual himself. And even if he did, we’d still be in a queer relationship because, again…I’m politically, socially, intrinsically queer. I just feel like the queer community needs to be more welcoming of people who “look” like they’re in traditional, hetero relationships. Even heterosexual relationships can have queer elements – take polyamory, for instance. I don’t believe that being queer ought to be defined by what others believe queer means – it’s all about how a person feels inside. Queer spaces ought to be welcoming to everyone, and as a community, we should be extra careful not to label people as soon as we learn small details about them. I didn’t turn into a “queer ally” by deciding to start seeing this guy – I’m still a card-carrying gaysi, thanks!
Loading ...
Well said. The very people who are fighting to not be judged can be quick to judge. Makes me wonder who’s narrow and who isn’t.
i just always assume goodwill in people, and i always think that someone who has been through something difficult is better able to have empathy for others, but i’m being proven wrong, lol
I say enjoy!
I read this post once and then I read it again. I certainly find it very suggestive. The theorisation of “queer” and the significant push to its boundaries are well thought and well articulated. I really enjoyed it. Perhaps this is how queerness should pan out i.e., into spaces that become, often through a process of exclusion, conventionally associated with the normative. Thanks for writing this piece Misszero!
Thank you for enjoying it
fuck it. just go have fun…as long as you are happy…
Very well articulated misszero! I am really not surprised by the bi-phobia in the Queer community. You don’t owe an explanation to anyone. Follow your heart and have fun! Good luck.
I loved the title!
The hypocrisy could not have been articulated better. You go girl!
To quote Blaise Pascal:
The heart has its reason, which reason knows nothing of.
Good to know that your partner doesn’t identify as heterosexual.
I know a bunch of Germans who are technically straight, but since they’re so open-minded towards queerty, they consider themselves non-heterosexually queer. Like sexual identity taking a U-turn on itself.
And it’s definitely good to know you’re wanted by both sexes! Didn’t happen to me until recently you know?
Just like we’ve worked hard to purge the term ‘queer’ of its derisive connotations, and ‘gay’ of its stereotypes (uncommitted, promiscuous, etc.) I think it’s time to purge ‘bisexual’ of its derisive connotations (promiscuous, indecisive, confused, etc.).
The more people who are bisexual come out, regardless of whether they are single, in a same-sex relationship, other-sex relationship or cis-trans relationship, the easier it will be for us to confront the stereotypes and reclaim bi for what it is, which is simply attraction to people of any/either sex, regardless of the strength of that attraction.
I totally agree that we need to reclaim bisexual, but I still don’t think it is how I identify. My personal issue with the term bisexual is that it reaffirms the gender binary. And I’m most attracted to people who don’t fit nicely in the binary boxes. But I also believe its not a crime to be solely attracted to cis-women and men, so for those individuals, I do believe that the term bisexual needs to purged of its negative connotations.
You might be interested in this thoughtful response to the critique that bisexual upholds the ideas of the binary: http://radicalbi.wordpress.com/2011/02/22/words-binary-and-biphobia-or-why-bi-is-binary-but-ftm-is-not/
For others, there’s always pansexual, as a word that is more specific than queer but explicitly extends to those whose attractions are not limited to men and women.